Final changes before presentation.

diff --git a/presentation.tex b/presentation.tex
index 9578e260e4dddfbe164d73c915fa73f4e9edf61d..7c0790fd2d1b4b8f8b91fd596a8e0057f25bf3c0 100644 (file)
--- a/presentation.tex
+++ b/presentation.tex
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ candidates for exploring these optimisations.
 \frametitle{Sparsity in the FFT-box}
 
 \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/fftbox}}
 \frametitle{Sparsity in the FFT-box}
 
 \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/fftbox}}

+\footnote{Skylaris, Mostofi, Haynes, Pickard \& Payne, 2001, "Accurate kinetic
+energy evaluation in electronic structure calculations with localized functions
+on a real space grid".}

 
 }
 
 
 }
 


@@ -146,7 +149,7 @@ Looking at FFTs:
 
 \item In other cases, only a restricted subset of the result data is used.
 
 
 \item In other cases, only a restricted subset of the result data is used.
 

-\item Is it possible to exploit this to reduce to cost?
+\item Is it possible to exploit this to reduce the computational cost?

 
 \end{itemize}
 
 
 \end{itemize}
 


@@ -157,7 +160,7 @@ difference:
 
 \begin{itemize}
 
 
 \begin{itemize}
 

-\item Perhaps finite difference can produce an acceptible result for some
+\item Perhaps finite difference can produce an acceptable result for some

 quantities.
 
 \item How do scaling properties compare to FFT-based approaches?
 quantities.
 
 \item How do scaling properties compare to FFT-based approaches?