Convert from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8.

diff --git a/relat10.tex b/relat10.tex
index dbaedec6bc027d1577c1a3922993acaa2dc57eaf..f57d35bfff37ef2da1da8fa1264166a54918cfb4 100644 (file)
--- a/relat10.tex
+++ b/relat10.tex
@@ -1649,9 +1649,9 @@ that the relations of the Galileian transformstion exist between the
 co-ordinates of $K$ and $K'$. It thus appears that, of all Galileian
 co-ordinate systems, one ($K$) corresponding to a particular state of
 motion is physically unique. This result was interpreted physically by
-regarding $K$ as at rest with respect to a hypothetical æther of space.
+regarding $K$ as at rest with respect to a hypothetical æther of space.
 On the other hand, all coordinate systems $K'$ moving relatively to $K$
-were to be regarded as in motion with respect to the æther. To this
+were to be regarded as in motion with respect to the æther. To this
 motion of $K'$ against the {\ae}ther (``{\ae}ther-drift'' relative to $K'$) were
 attributed the more complicated laws which were supposed to hold
 relative to $K'$. Strictly speaking, such an {\ae}ther-drift ought also to
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ method which appears as though it must be decisive. Imagine two
 mirrors so arranged on a rigid body that the reflecting surfaces face
 each other. A ray of light requires a perfectly definite time T to
 pass from one mirror to the other and back again, if the whole system
-be at rest with respect to the æther. It is found by calculation,
+be at rest with respect to the æther. It is found by calculation,
 however, that a slightly different time $T'$ is required for this
 process, if the body, together with the mirrors, be moving relatively
 to the {\ae}ther. And yet another point: it is shown by calculation that
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ involving interference in which this difference should have been
 clearly detectable. But the experiment gave a negative result---a
 fact very perplexing to physicists. Lorentz and FitzGerald rescued the
 theory from this difficulty by assuming that the motion of the body
-relative to the æther produces a contraction of the body in the
+relative to the æther produces a contraction of the body in the
 direction of motion, the amount of contraction being just sufficient
 to compensate for the differeace in time mentioned above. Comparison
 with the discussion in Section 11 shows that also from the
@@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@ was the right one. But on the basis of the theory of relativity the
 method of interpretation is incomparably more satisfactory. According
 to this theory there is no such thing as a ``specially favoured''
 (unique) co-ordinate system to occasion the introduction of the
-æther-idea, and hence there can be no æther-drift, nor any experiment
+æther-idea, and hence there can be no æther-drift, nor any experiment
 with which to demonstrate it. Here the contraction of moving bodies
 follows from the two fundamental principles of the theory, without the
 introduction of particular hypotheses; and as the prime factor
@@ -3922,7 +3922,7 @@ whether or not these displacements are to be referred in reality to
 the effect of gravitation. The results of observation have been
 collected together, and discussed in detail from the standpoint of the
 question which has been engaging our attention here, in a paper by E.
-Freundlich entitled ``Zur Prüfung der allgemeinen
+Freundlich entitled ``Zur Prüfung der allgemeinen
 Relativit\"ats-Theorie" ({\it Die Naturwissenschaften}, 1919, No. 35,
 p. 520: Julius Springer, Berlin).