From 8a12c7d724098006e68619d858718fb4c4236ff8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francis Russell Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:57:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Final changes before presentation. --- presentation.tex | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/presentation.tex b/presentation.tex index 9578e26..7c0790f 100644 --- a/presentation.tex +++ b/presentation.tex @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ candidates for exploring these optimisations. \frametitle{Sparsity in the FFT-box} \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{\includegraphics{images/fftbox}} +\footnote{Skylaris, Mostofi, Haynes, Pickard \& Payne, 2001, "Accurate kinetic +energy evaluation in electronic structure calculations with localized functions +on a real space grid".} } @@ -146,7 +149,7 @@ Looking at FFTs: \item In other cases, only a restricted subset of the result data is used. -\item Is it possible to exploit this to reduce to cost? +\item Is it possible to exploit this to reduce the computational cost? \end{itemize} @@ -157,7 +160,7 @@ difference: \begin{itemize} -\item Perhaps finite difference can produce an acceptible result for some +\item Perhaps finite difference can produce an acceptable result for some quantities. \item How do scaling properties compare to FFT-based approaches? -- 2.47.3